
It is not without some trepidation that I post this. But (and here’s my way to unceremoniously announce this) since this is my last week at Brains on Fire*, I may as well go for broke!
Over the years, I have developed a rather sizable amount of venom toward Apple. Not good, working where I work, among a tribe of “believers.” Perhaps it’s even BECAUSE I’m surrounded by all these believers that my tendency to be contrary has taken on such vehemence. Perhaps you’ll recall my post a few years ago about not wanting an iPod? And my subsequent admission that I ended up caving? Now… this post could be about the fact that said iPod has been nothing but trouble since I bought it, but it won’t be. Spike’s sick of hearing about that anyway. I’m not even going to argue about Apple vs. PC or attack Apple outright. The fact is, Apple makes a very good tool for graphic and creative applications. And I am definitely not going to argue that Microsoft rocks… it doesn’t (I will never succumb to Vista!).
My real conundrum is this: The general sentiment these days is that a brand has to be open and interact with its customers – inviting them to own and engage with the company – in order to survive and thrive. But doesn’t it seem that Apple does the opposite? We talk about transparency, about letting those who love you get close, “opening the kimono (which I think is a really gross term)” to give them a peek, rewarding their loyalty… Apple doesn’t do any of those things. Do they make good products? Absolutely (my iPod notwithstanding). But they are secretive and exclusive and “reward” their fans only by coming out with the exact same product slightly cooler 6 months later so you have something new to covet. An insider story from an old teacher of mine (the specifics of which I won’t share out of respect for my teacher) who used to work on the Apple marketing confirmed for me that the company’s motivation is not generally with their customers in mind. It’s about what’s “cool.” They all but admitted how overhyped the iPhone was when they refunded $100 to some of the early purchasers because they had so overpriced their product that even Apple felt guilty about it.
I had a problem with my iPod recently and looked online for help, where I was informed I “do not qualify for phone support.” Having spent a good deal of money on their product, I don’t “qualify” to have a condescending tech guy roll his eyes at me over the phone. I’ve spent far less and gotten far more by way of long-term support. (And before you comment Scott, yes… I know that I could have paid more to get the Applecare plan [which would have expired by now]… and no, there is no Apple Store in Greenville.)
One of the Mac Heads around here said that when people tried to create their own applications for the iPhone, it would “brick” – become totally useless. They were actually penalizing their customers for trying to love and personalize their product. To be fair, I have heard they are working to rectify this… but still… This “there’s no way you could make this product better” sort of mentality floors me.
Now… what Apple DOES do EXTREMELY well is stand for something. From their famous “Think Different” and “1984″ spots up through today, Apple has elevated its brand beyond being a tool company. Microsoft will always be a tool company… that’s just who they are. But Apple stands for creativity… and perhaps the emotional nature of that forte is what attracts such passion despite their refusal to display many of the open “transparent” behaviors that are preached so often these days.
So there ya go. You can post 30,000 comments about how I “don’t get it.” And you’ll be right. But you’ll be missing my point. I don’t worship at the altar of Apple and I never will. Your comments won’t convert me… and I’m sure you all don’t want me in your club anyway. I am just pondering the extremely person-based success of a company that seems so much more concerned with its cool factor than with its customers. If you have examples to contradict me, by all means, share them. I’m not looking to stir up a hornet’s nest so much as I’m looking to understand what appears to be the exception to the rule.
*If it happens to interest you, I am leaving Brains on Fire to pursue my MA in Theatre at the University of South Carolina. Good times. I’ll post my official final post on Thursday… provided I finish writing it.
Pingback: links for 2008-07-30 | Daan Jansonius